B Bolden Advisory
See the math Book a 30-min diagnostic
Revenue & technology advisory · Renton, WA

Your strategy isn't the problem.
Execution capacity is.

We help mid-market leadership teams turn a revenue plan or a technology purchase into a working system — a defined motion, the platform underneath it, and someone accountable in the room until the number moves.

Book a 30-minute diagnostic See how an engagement runs
Fixed scope, fixed fee
No open-ended retainers
One accountable owner
Not a rotating bench
MBE / OMWBE certified
Diversity-spend eligible
What we're accountable for
FIRST 90 DAYS
Qualified pipeline coverage
2.0× → 3.5×
Target set with your CRO in week 1 · measured in your CRM
Time to first productive deal
−30 to −60 days
New-hire ramp, measured from start date
Forecast accuracy at commit
±10%
Board-reportable, same definition every quarter
Targets are agreed in writing at kickoff and reviewed monthly. If a target isn't moving, we say so in the review — not at renewal.
Two problems, one operating model Revenue that doesn't compound / Technology you bought but never operationalized / Usually both, and they're related
The outcomes

Four results.
Each one has a number attached.

If an engagement can't be tied to one of these, we'll tell you it isn't worth buying. Every artifact we produce exists to move one of these four lines.

01

Win rate

Fewer deals, better qualified

A single qualification standard applied to every open deal, so the team stops spending Q3 on business that was never going to close.

02

Ramp time

New hires productive sooner

A 30-60-90 that's specific to your market and your product, so a new seller isn't reinventing the motion from scratch.

03

Forecast

A number the board can trust

Stage definitions with entry and exit criteria, enforced in the CRM you already own. Same definition every quarter.

04

Adoption

Platforms actually used

The security, observability, and AI tooling you've licensed, configured against real use cases and owned by a named person.

The ASCEND method

One method. Six stages.
Clarity at every step.

Each stage has a defined input, a defined output, and a decision gate. You always know which stage you're in. You can stop at any gate — that's deliberate, not a loophole.

A sculptural limestone staircase rising through a sunlit atrium
Strategy. Systems. Execution.
Your delivery timeline

From the first assessment
to measurable progress.

Three clear phases. Defined deliverables. Decisions along the way.

  1. Weeks
    01–02

    Diagnose

    Understand the starting point, identify the gaps and decide what deserves investment.

    MilestoneA clear diagnosis and a decision to proceed.
  2. Weeks
    03–06

    Design & build

    Turn the priorities into a practical plan and configure the systems that make it work.

    MilestoneA working system, ready for your team.
  3. Weeks
    07–12

    Operate & prove

    Support adoption, review live performance and measure the outcome against the original targets.

    MilestoneResults reviewed. A clear next decision.
Inside the method

Six stages. Nothing left vague.

A01

Assess

Pipeline, stage hygiene, license inventory, and a maturity score across four domains.

Your deliverableMaturity score + gap map
Decision gate

Is the gap worth fixing?

S02

Strategy

Which segment, which motion, which platform decision comes first — sequenced.

Your deliverable90-day priority roadmap
Decision gate

Do we agree on sequence?

C03

Configure

Stage definitions, qualification standard, and platform config built in your systems.

Your deliverableConfigured CRM + runbooks
Decision gate

Does it work in a live deal?

E04

Enable

Managers first, then reps. Working sessions on real opportunities, not case studies.

Your deliverableTrained team + coaching cadence
Decision gate

Are managers running it?

N05

Navigate

Weekly deal reviews and warm introductions while the new motion is still fragile.

Your deliverableLive deal support
Decision gate

Is the metric moving?

D06

Deliver

Executive review against the targets set at kickoff. Continue, hand off, or stop.

Your deliverableKPI review + handoff pack
Decision gate

Renew, or run it yourselves?

Diagram 01 · Revenue operating model

What we actually install

Not a training day. A closed loop: every stage has an entry test, an owner, an artifact, and a field in your CRM that proves it happened. If a stage can't be measured, it isn't a stage.

For the CRO: stage exit criteria your managers can enforce in a 1:1.
For the CFO: one weighted-pipeline calculation, not four.
For the CIO: configured in the CRM you own. No new system to buy.
The revenue loop · Every stage is evidenced
S0

Target

Fits written ICP

Owner
Marketing / SDR
Artifact
Account plan
CRM evidence
ICP score field
S1

Qualify

Pain + metric named

Owner
AE
Artifact
Discovery notes
CRM evidence
Metric field
S2

Validate

Champion tested

Owner
AE + SE
Artifact
Champion map
CRM evidence
Champion field
S3

Justify

Business case signed off

Owner
AE + Finance
Artifact
ROI model
CRM evidence
Attached case
S4

Commit

Paper process mapped

Owner
AE + Manager
Artifact
Mutual close plan
CRM evidence
Close plan date

Feedback loop: weekly deal review → stage hygiene report → coaching action → forecast at commit

Diagram 02 · Reference architecture

Secure, observable, AI-ready — in the order that actually works

We're a certified reseller, so we can source the platforms. The reason to buy them from us is the layer above: use cases defined before purchase, an owner named before deployment, and value proven before renewal.

Dark glass server cabinets with warm architectural lighting
If you're the CEO, here's the whole thing in one line
You are probably paying for tools nobody has finished turning on. We find those first, then buy only what's missing.
01

Tier 1 — Sources

what already generates signal

Endpoint & identityCrowdStrike · Okta
Cloud & networkPalo Alto · cloud-native logs
ApplicationsAPM agents · traces
Business systemsERP · CRM · ITSM
02

Tier 2 — Pipeline

collect once, route everywhere

Open telemetry collectionOpenTelemetry
Routing & tiered retentionhot / warm / archive
Backup & recoveryRubrik
03

Tier 3 — Analytics

detect, observe, correlate

SIEM & detection engineeringSplunk
Observability & SLOsDatadog
AIOps correlationevent → incident
04

Tier 4 — Act & govern

where value is actually realized

Workflow & automationServiceNow
AI use cases & guardrailsLLM readiness · data foundation
Governance & evidencecontrol mapping · SOC 2
Business outcomeMean time to detect measured, not assumed
CFO outcomeOverlapping licenses consolidated at renewal
Audit outcomeControls evidenced for insurers and SOC 2
Sourcing · Carahsoft (SLED) · vendor-direct (commercial)
Purchase order required before any delivery
Diagram 03 · Agentic AI systems

Agents that do the work — and can be held to account for it

A chatbot answers. An agent decides, calls a system, and changes something. That difference is the whole engineering problem: an agent needs permissions, a verification step, and an audit trail before it touches a customer or a ledger.

We build the narrow, boring, high-volume ones first — the tasks where a wrong answer is cheap and caught — then widen the mandate once the evaluation numbers earn it.

The agent loop · Every step is logged
01

Retrieve

Pulls only the data its role permits

Permission
Read-scoped
Guardrail
PII filter
Evidence
Source citation
02

Plan

Breaks the task into checkable steps

Permission
None
Guardrail
Step budget
Evidence
Plan trace
03

Act

Calls your systems through defined tools

Permission
Write, allow-listed
Guardrail
Approval on threshold
Evidence
Action log
04

Verify

Checks its own work against a rule set

Permission
Read-only
Guardrail
Rule + eval set
Evidence
Pass / fail score
05

Escalate

Hands to a human below confidence threshold

Permission
Human queue
Guardrail
SLA on response
Evidence
Corrected example

Escalation path: low confidence → human queue → corrected example → added to the evaluation set

Deployment stack · bottom-up, because the bottom is where projects die
Use case & value case
Layer 5
One task, volume counted, cost per task today, target error rate agreed in writing before anything is built.
Owner: business lead
Orchestration
Layer 4
Planning, task decomposition, memory, and multi-agent handoff where a single agent genuinely can't cover the task.
Owner: engineering
Tools & data access
Layer 3
The agent's hands: API and MCP-style tool definitions, retrieval over your own documents, least-privilege service accounts.
Owner: platform + IT
Evaluation & guardrails
Layer 2
A graded test set built from real historical cases, run on every change. Refusal rules, spend ceilings, and approval thresholds.
Owner: shared, we build it
Governance & observability
Layer 1
Every prompt, tool call, and outcome logged and queryable. Policy on acceptable use, data residency, and human accountability.
Owner: CIO / risk
Runs where you are
Your cloud tenant and your data boundary — not ours
Cost control
Per-task token budget with a hard ceiling and a spend dashboard
Model choice
Swappable by design; no rewrite when a cheaper model wins
Where we start · first 60 days
Proposal and RFP drafting
LOW RISK
Assembles a first draft from your past winning responses, then a human edits. Never sends.
Proof: hours per response, before and after
Tier-1 ticket triage
LOW RISK
Classifies, routes, and drafts the first reply in your ITSM queue with approval before it posts.
Proof: % correctly routed, time to first touch
Account and pipeline research
LOW RISK
Compiles account briefs and fills CRM fields the team currently skips, flagged as agent-sourced.
Proof: field completeness, prep time saved
Alert enrichment for the SOC
MEDIUM RISK
Gathers context around an alert and proposes a disposition. Analyst still decides.
Proof: analyst minutes per alert, false-positive rate
We will talk you out of a customer-facing agent as the first deployment. It's the most visible and the least forgiving place to learn.
Co-pilot Architect · the Bolden Swarm

Give an understaffed team the throughput of a larger one.

Public-sector work is rarely one task. A solicitation, a grant report, a records request, a security incident — each is a chain of research, drafting, cross-checking, and evidence, moving between people who are already fully committed. The backlog isn't a judgment problem. It's a throughput problem.

A contemporary technology infrastructure corridor

The Co-pilot Architect is our deployed agent capability for exactly that shape of work. It carries the assembly — the reading, the first draft, the cross-check, the citation list — and hands your staff a package to judge instead of a blank page. A named public servant still approves anything that leaves the building.

What the agency gets, and what it keeps

Decisions stay yours

Nothing is sent, filed, published, or committed without a named staff approval — and the approval is part of the record.

Defensible on request

Every source read and every action taken is logged and queryable, with retention and disclosure rules applied — so a records request, an auditor, or a council member gets a straight answer.

Inside your boundary

Runs in the agency’s own tenant against least-privilege access. Your data does not leave to train anything.

Budget-safe

Per-task cost ceiling agreed before go-live, with a spend dashboard. No surprise consumption line in the next biennium.

Measured, not demoed

Accuracy is graded against a test set built from your own historical cases, with a target agreed in writing before anything goes live.

The method and the guardrails are documented for your team. The internal composition of the swarm is ours — you're buying the outcome and the accountability around it, not a diagram to maintain.
Where it earns its keep in SLED

Four workloads.
One clear opportunity.

Where the queue is the problem, not the judgment.

One workload. One quarter.Baseline measured before, not estimated after.
01

Solicitations and scopes of work

A first-draft scope and evaluation criteria assembled from your prior awards and the requesting department’s intake notes, ready for procurement to edit.

What gets measuredStaff days per solicitation, and how many go out on schedule
02

Grant applications and reporting

Narrative drafted against the funder’s own criteria, with figures pulled from your systems and each one traced to where it came from.

What gets measuredApplications submitted per cycle; findings at close-out
03

Public records requests

Responsive material located, exemptions flagged for the attorney’s review, and the response package assembled with its citation list.

What gets measuredDays to first production; backlog age
04

Service desk and incident triage

Tickets and alerts classified, routed, and enriched with the context an analyst would otherwise spend twenty minutes gathering.

What gets measuredTime to first touch; percentage correctly routed
Not first We will talk you out of a constituent-facing agent as your first deployment. It's the most visible and the least forgiving place to learn, and the backlog that's actually hurting you is almost always internal.
Diagram 04 · The economics

Here's the arithmetic.
Change the inputs to yours.

We're not going to claim a 50:1 return. Below is a worked example with every assumption visible, so your CFO can argue with the inputs instead of the conclusion.

Financial charts, a calculator and a brass pen on a walnut desk
Visible assumptions. Measurable value.
01 · The inputs

Assumptions

Annual new-business target
$2.0M
Quota-carrying sellers
6
Average deal size
$85K
Current win rate
22%
Win-rate improvement modeled
+4 pts
Gross margin
55%

Illustrative mid-market figures — 108 deals worked at a 22% win rate ties back to the $2.0M target above. We rebuild this with your real numbers in the Assess stage.

02 · The calculation

Working

  1. 01
    Deals worked per year at current coverage6 sellers × 18 deals = 108
  2. 02
    Incremental wins from +4 pts108 × 0.04 = 4.3 deals
  3. 03
    Incremental revenue4.3 × $85K = $367K
  4. 04
    Incremental gross profit$367K × 55% = $202K
  5. 05
    Less engagement fee$202K − $25K = $177K net
03 · The modeled result
8.1×

Gross profit per
dollar invested.

Gross profit returned per dollar of a $25K 90-day engagement, on these assumptions alone — before any effect on ramp time or renewals.

Net after engagement fee$177K
Payback~5 months
Break-even0.5 pts win rate

If your break-even needs more than two points of win rate, we'll tell you the engagement is too big for your pipeline.

For the room

Four people have to say yes.
Here’s each one’s version.

Same engagement, four different questions. Send this section to whoever is skeptical.

01
Business outcomes

CEO

“Will this show up in the number, or is it another initiative?”
What they get

Three named targets, a monthly review, and permission to stop at any gate.

Measured byRevenue vs. plan, and whether targets set at kickoff were hit
02
Revenue execution

CRO

“Will my managers actually run it after you leave?”
What they get

Stage exit criteria, a deal-review agenda, and manager enablement before rep training.

Measured byCoverage ratio, stage conversion, forecast variance at commit
03
Financial confidence

CFO

“What's the payback and what happens if it doesn't work?”
What they get

Fixed fee, visible assumptions, and a break-even stated before you sign.

Measured byGross profit per engagement dollar; license spend consolidated
04
Technology ownership

CTO / CIO

“Are you adding systems I'll have to support?”
What they get

Configuration in platforms you already own, documented, with a named internal owner.

Measured byTooling overlap removed; MTTD/MTTR baselined then tracked
Engagements

Three ways in.
Start at the smallest one.

Nobody should sign a 90-day engagement before a two-week diagnostic tells them what's actually broken.

Fixed fee. Scope in writing.Tooling and templates included at no charge.
Exit at any gate.
01Start here
2 weeks

Diagnostic Sprint

$4.5K – $8.5K

You suspect something is broken but the diagnosis keeps changing depending on who you ask.

What’s included
  • Stakeholder interviews and Art-of-the-Possible session
  • Maturity score across four domains
  • Gap-to-action map with effort and impact
  • 90-day priority roadmap you own outright
Start with the diagnostic
02
90 days

90-Day Build

$12K – $25K

The diagnosis is agreed and you need the motion built and running, not documented.

What’s included
  • Everything in the Diagnostic Sprint
  • CRM stages, qualification standard, and runbooks configured
  • Manager and seller enablement on live deals
  • Warm introductions where our network overlaps your ICP
  • KPI review against kickoff targets at day 90
Scope a 90-day build
03
Monthly · 3-month minimum

Embedded Advisory

$6K – $18K / mo

You need a fractional revenue or technology leader in the room until the capability is internal.

What’s included
  • Fractional CRO / CIO-level partner
  • Weekly office hours and deal support
  • Quarterly maturity review and board narrative
  • Sourcing and renewal negotiation as a certified reseller
  • Exit plan written at month one, not month twelve
Discuss an embedded engagement

Public sector: quotes available on NASPO ValuePoint and WA DES/WEBS vehicles, and via Carahsoft for co-prime and teaming arrangements.

What we can and can't claim

A new firm.
Straight with you about it.

Bolden Advisory was founded in 2026. We don't have a decade of logos to show you, and a wall of consulting-firm names isn't proof of anything either — so here's what's actually verifiable.

If you want references, ask on the diagnostic call and we'll tell you honestly who you can talk to and who you can't.

Our standardClear claims.
Clear boundaries.

Credentials, experience and methods are presented separately from client outcome evidence.

01
Verifiable

Washington OMWBE-certified MBE. UEI Q88BH7NBAQ45. Diversity-spend eligible for prime contractors with supplier-diversity targets.

02
Verifiable

Authorized reseller relationships including Rubrik and ServiceNow, with Carahsoft access for public-sector vehicles.

03
Verifiable

20+ years of complex, consultative technology sales and delivery experience behind the practice, plus an international MBA, a UC Berkeley degree in rhetoric, MIT education in agentic AI strategy and architecture, and Carnegie Mellon coursework in agentic AI currently in progress — ask for the specifics on the call.

Method, not proof

The frameworks we build on — MEDDPICC, Challenger, McKinsey and Kellogg GTM — are published and public. Using them isn't a credential; applying them to your pipeline is the work.

Not yet claimable

Multi-year client outcome data. When we have it, it'll appear here with the client's name attached and their permission on file.

Thirty minutes, one question: is anything here worth your money?

Bring your pipeline report or your license inventory. You'll leave with two or three specific things to fix, whether or not you hire us.

Book the diagnostic call Send me a sample assessment first